Brilliant post from Nicholas Carr differentiating between situational overload and ambient overload (the comments are also worth a read). He argues against the Clay Shirky talk that advanced “It’s not information overload. It’s filter failure.”
I agree with Carr – better filters mean that rather than just finding the good stuff we find ourselves overwhelmed with good stuff. In health I find increasingly I am guiding users to places where they won’t be buried under an avalanche of interesting material about their topic. In the mean time there are still needles in haystacks – check out this video of a GP trying to locate a fact in some NICE Guidance. I wonder what they will make of the new NICE pathways promised for May of this year?
(Incidentally Shirky is speaking at the MLA in Minneapolis – wouldn’t it be great to have a something of a similar ilk at a future HLG conference!).
So Microsoft have declared the death of IE6 and you can watch it going on a special site – Internet Explorer 6 Countdown.
Not everyone is convinced about the good intentions of MS with suggestions that globally much IE6 use is on pirated XP software and that IE8 without a development path from IE6 is not a great help.
I rather like this earlier site suggesting we should in fact be saving IE6. I particularly like how the Save IE6 site congratulates me on using self same browser while the countdown site points out the error of my browsing ways.
Yes – along with many in the NHS I am living in an IE6 world. The IE6 Countdown reckons only 3.5% of browser share in the UK is IE6. I wonder how much of this must be the NHS (this article would suggest DWP have plenty still)?
Checking Google Analytics on my library catalogue for the last three months (Jan – Mar 2011) we get 94% IE use overall with 83% of that being IE6. The same period last year (Jan – Mar 2010) offers 95% IE overall with 93% of those IE6. And one more year back (Jan – Mar 2009) – I have no data – thanks Google Analytics.
So what does this tell us ? IE6 is falling slowly in the NHS but much slower than in the world at large. The reason for this is well known – a number of critical NHS systems still require IE6 as Microsoft realises and the DoH seems to want to ignore.
And how much of a problem is this? I think it is an accelerating one. Gradually the web is becoming a hostile place for IE6 – formatting awry on some pages, warnings on others and total block outs for newer versions of some sites. And the systems we use are starting to suffer – Proquest have a problem, Google Reader warns me daily, EBSCOhost requires IE7. On the plus side NHS Evidence have largely managed to keep the IE6 show on the road.
Our lovely local IT folk have installed Firefox on our machines but this is only a very partial solution. People are going to use their regular IE (6) browser as long as it remains available. I also do not really want the library team to get used to seeing something different to the bulk of the users.
I am afraid this one will run and run (or fail to run and display really badly).
PS Post title from a music blog post title that still amuses me to this day.
So asks an article in Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research this month. Evidence Based Medicine seeks to encourage the appraisal of the best evidence to answer clinical questions but this is not always practical in clinical practice: who has time to do a systematic review at the bedside?
The authors of the paper say that in order to triumph opinion and established methods in orthopaedic surgery clinicians need to be able to move beyond critical appraisal and know what sorts of information to use. The article distinguishes between ‘foraging’ and ‘hunting’ tools: ‘foraging’ tools are current awareness tools that alert a clinician to new resources in their field.
However, information obtained in this way rarely results in the clinician’s learning more than simply that the actual information exists (life would be so much easier if we could read something once, reflect on it, and thenremember it flawlessly when it is needed). Thus, a hunting tool is needed to retrieve relevant and valid information quickly when it is required in the care of patients. (page 2335-6)
These are clinical decision making aids and they summarise actions whilst including evidence quality gradings and take into account patient outcomes. This of course is not revolutionary, just interesting to read from a clinical point of view what library services are useful for and how to differentiate them and sell them in the language used by clinicians. Importantly the articles says that not all clinicians need to be fully competent in all 5 levels of EBM knowledge and practice (developing a quesiont, finding the evidence, evaluating the evidence, applying the evidence and reviewing ongoing practice) but in a competency based model of the 3 stages of information management they have different needs at different stages in their career or depending on their role. The information management framework says that they should at level 1 manage information at the point of care, at level 2 select the appropriate hunting tool and by level 3 they should be making patient-centered (and interestingly not evidence-centered) decisions. Perhaps it could be termed moving from the academic view of EBM to a more pragmatic applied view.
Orthopaedic surgeons work in a world in which access to medical information can provide rapid answers to queries. Taking that information access a step further would be to have access to high quality information that gives answers based upon EBM, that is relevant to the patient, has been analyzed and validated by EBM experts and is now ready to use. Information management is the engineering science that connects the surgeon to the high quality information when and where it’s needed. Working backward toward our orthopaedists in training, learning to apply information management to patient-centered care requires a shift. That shift is away from wrestling with the 5 steps of EBM and moving to the appropriate level of IM. (page 2638)
I was reading an article on why everyone hates HR. The post was so so, but what I found really interesting were the comments. Taking them as representative, people really do hate HR! (but of course, who takes comments as representative, or at least representative of what…?). Anyway, regardless of my views re: HR, one of the comments caught my eye:
“Though a bit wordy – I think you are correct.. IT departments do the same aswell – They feel they are separate from the business and by thinking it, make it so..”
… thus making the point that somehow HR professionals consider themselves in some way removed from the rest of the business. And I wondered, are information professionals and librarian-y types the same? If I were to ask you, do you consider your first loyalty to your profession, or to your company – which would it be? If you had to do something that in some way “harmed” your standing as an info pro, or “harmed” the requirements of your business, which would you choose?
For me I didn’t need to think about it at all – my loyalty is to my company; the needs of the business. Perhaps this is why I don’t sometimes feel like I’m a fully paid-up member of the information profession – that and because I joined the profession relatively late. But I think I’m right, aren’t I? I mean, what is the point, from a CEO’s point of view, of having an employee who is not primarily thinking of the needs of the business? Surely we’re doing ourselves no favours if we’re too precious about our profession?
We had a discussion at work recently about how we should keep up to date with drug topics we monitor. We do this to see what is happening with licensing in this country and/or in the US/Europe and then we might also be tracking disease areas also for other types of work. So what to use? We previously gave the drug topic monitoring job to one person in the team who would scan choice journals and send photocopies of the results but these were often out of date and this is an onerous job for one person remembering perhaps 10s or 100s of topic indications. We narrowed down the following to some essentials and others as optional but I would be interested to know what sources other people use.
- NeLM or National Electronic Library of Medicine. A “‘one stop’ platform from which users can easily find medicines information that matters in a simple and coherent manner”. Daily email alert delivered as headlines and often includes commentary and links to original sources. Pretty much our gold standard. Takes info from a range of sources: UK medicines information (UKMi), National Prescribing Centre and Medicines Compendium online to name but a few.
- PharmaTimes. This is on our core list as well although I have to admit I don’t use it, I think there was something weird about their sign up and it didn’t want to sign me up argh. We purchase some similar titles and this is all about e-TOCs.
- New drugs online. Produced by UKMi and ingested by NHS Evidence as well, NHS registered people can access more info than publically accessible too. Excellent for news and reporting of trials/regulatory stuff for new drugs. Example for lorcaserin for obesity.
- Medical News Today. US based although however news is captured it is truely worldwide. Sources include “JAMA, BMJ, Lancet, BMA, plus articles written by our own team”. Categorised into sections covering major disease areas these daily alerts are very comprehensive.
- Drugs.com. US again but good for FDA alerts that may influence European/National decisions. Probably more generalist/consumer level information
- Pharmalot. Blog from which you can receive alerts along the lines of investigative journalism and debate about pharmaceutical companies and drug development in general. Or “commentary on the pharmaceutical industry and related litigation.” The backstory of what makes the news later e.g. rosiglitazone.
- And other things: NHS Institute alerts (mainly implementation and while we’re on that see Implementation Science journal), the CASH database which aimed to be the national current awareness service although is reportedly biased towards whoever is updating it weekly and more traditional alerts from saved searches and e-TOCs galore.
How you manage these is up to you. I can’t help but scan them almost daily but do searches of the folder I bung them in in my inbox on a monthly basis…
Whenever you meet someone “important”, let’s say a CEO, an influential academic, a successful (or indeed unsuccessful) entrepreneur, or a prodigious blogger with a large following, *sigh*, one is often struck by how charismatic they are. They seem to be comfortable with themselves and carry quiet (or sometimes loud) authority. I often think that their confidence and charisma were no doubt key to them getting to their successful position in life, work, organisation, profession etc.
Then on the train the other day I was watching a TED podcast with Seth Godin talking about leading tribes. It’s worth watching, just ten mins or so. But right at the end of the talk, virtually the last sentence I think, he said that if you fear that you don’t have the charisma (or the force of personality, or the “quiet authority”) to lead a tribe he said don’t worry, simply being the leader, being the person who took it upon themselves to take the initiative, will give you charisma. I mean apparently, even John Major had a certain “presence” when he was prime minister: there’s hope for us all.
My much loved bloglines account has got to go. After 6 plus years of faithful service (an eternity in web terms) Ask have seen fit to kill it off.
Apparently no one reads RSS anymore (stats for Google Reader use suggest something different) – all part of the death of the blog meme (see also, Death of the blog comment and so on). All the cool kids are on twitter. So why am I so annoyed? Bloglines didn’t ever develop much (I tried the major revision they released and soon retreated to the basic old version) but it did a pretty good job of the task in hand. Reading was quick and I saved the things I either couldn’t follow up immediately or wanted to hang on to. I never noticed the problems others alleged with outages and the Bloglines Plumber.
So what? Just move to Google Reader like most people have already. Problem is I already have a Google Reader account used for a Current Awareness Service. I can have two Google Accounts logged in at once but it gets all tangled on itself quite frequently. Thus far I don’t particularly like Google Reader as a user experience either.
Oh and of course I work mostly in IE6 land. So everytime I go into Google Reader it suggests I need to upgrade my software. And Google are definitely starting to get more aggressive not even allowing IE6 folk to use some of their products (hurrah no Google Instant for me!) so I may be out on my ear in the not too distant future.
Others have said it but once more with feeling – thanks Ask – thanks a lot.